Skip to the record
Skip to content Skip to footer
Human rights defenders / Tunisia / Meriem Bribri
Non-final conviction

Meriem
Bribri

Meriem Bribri was sentenced to four months in prison and fined for sharing a video of police violence on Facebook. A telecommunications law was used to prosecute her criticism of security forces.

Country
Tunisia
Role
Blogger / online writer
Sentence
Four months in prison and a fine of 500 Tunisian dinars.
Meriem Bribri
Status
At liberty
Sentence
Four months in prison and a fine of 500 Tunisian dinars.
Judicial status
Convicted, not final
Name in Arabic
مريم بريبري
Charges
  • Knowingly harming or disturbing others via public telecommunications networks under Article 86 of the Telecommunication Code of 2001
§ 01 · The case

The arrest, and what followed.

Background and Work

Meriem Bribri is a blogger and human rights monitor based in Sfax, in southeastern Tunisia. Her work centres on documenting violations of civil rights and abuses by state security forces. She has participated in youth-led protests challenging laws that restrict freedom of expression, and she uses social media to amplify evidence of police violence and to call for accountability.

In a country where the gap between constitutional guarantees and street-level enforcement has widened, Bribri represents a generation of digital defenders who use accessible technology to hold power to account. Her posts document incidents that official channels ignore or deny.

The Facebook Post and the Complaint

In October 2020, Bribri reposted a video on her Facebook page. The footage, filmed in Nabeul, a city on Tunisia's northeastern coast, showed a security officer physically assaulting a civilian. Bribri added commentary criticising the violence used by some members of the security forces in the course of their duties.

The Tunisian Security Union, which represents police officers, filed a complaint against her with the General Prosecutor in Sfax. On 8 October 2020 Sfax police questioned her, and a prosecutor charged her the same day. The union invoked Article 86 of the Telecommunication Code of 2001, a provision that criminalises the use of public telecommunications networks to "knowingly harm third parties or disrupt their peace." The statute carries a sentence of one to two years' imprisonment and a fine of 100 to 1,000 Tunisian dinars.

The Trial and Sentence

On 21 December 2021, the Court of First Instance in Sfax convicted Bribri under Article 86. The court sentenced her to four months in prison and a fine of 500 dinars. The prosecution was based solely on her having shared the video and criticised police conduct.

Bribri contested the validity of the proceedings. She was not provided with the case file detailing the evidence, notes, or formal charges against her. Fundamental judicial procedures were not respected. Her lawyer appealed on 23 December 2021, and the prosecutor also appealed.

Harassment and Threats

Following the conviction, Bribri faced harassment from security officers and members of the police union. Threats were made against her. The climate of intimidation intensified as her case moved through the appeals process.

The Sfax Court of Appeal heard the appeals of Bribri and the prosecutor on 28 September 2022, with judgment due on 12 October 2022. The outcome has not been found. She has remained free throughout.

Legal Context

Article 86 of Tunisia's Telecommunication Code has increasingly been used to prosecute human rights defenders who document and share evidence of abuses by security forces. The statute's vague language, "harming" or "disturbing" others via telecommunications networks, grants prosecutors and judges wide discretion to criminalise online speech, particularly criticism of state institutions.

Bribri's case is part of a broader pattern in which Tunisian authorities deploy telecommunications and cybercrime laws to silence those who expose police violence or challenge official narratives. The law functions as a tool of judicial harassment, punishing the messenger rather than addressing the abuse documented in the footage.

Case reference HM-TN-2026-009 Last updated · 8 November 2026 To ask for a removal or to add information: [email protected]