-
Introduction
Intersectionality and the right to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly (FoPA) are more connected than you might think. Their relationship shapes how we express ourselves collectively and our voices are heard in public spaces. I like to think of it as a tapestry, those intricate ones you might see in a museum. Each thread represents a part of someone’s identity – their gender, race, class. When these threads cross and intertwine, that’s intersectionality in action. It’s complex, beautiful, and sometimes messy, just like real life. Now, imagine unfurling this tapestry in the middle of a busy town square. That act? That’s FoPA at work. It’s about making these intersections visible, sparking conversations, and bringing people together around shared experiences and struggles.
Remember the Women’s March in 2017? That was a perfect example of this tapestry in action. On January 21, 2017, millions of people marched worldwide to draw attention to women’s rights and other social issues like climate change, immigration rights, and racial equality. The catalyst for the march was the election of President Trump, who made several statements during his campaign widely seen as anti-women or offensive. The march was the largest single-day protest in United States history.
-
Historical context
As people gather around the Freedom of Peaceful Assembly (FoPA) tapestry, not everyone finds it equally accessible. While some approach with ease, others face unseen obstacles that highlight the gap between the universal ideal of this right and its real-world application, which translates into invisible barriers and obstacles to FoPA vs. intersectionality.
Imagine a deaf activist, passionate about the cause but struggling to engage without sign language interpretation fully. Their assembly experience is fundamentally different from those who can hear every word and participate. Or consider an undocumented migrant, yearning to add their voice to the collective but held back by the very real fear of legal consequences. Their right to assemble is overshadowed by the constant threat of discovery and deportation (including arbitrary deportations). Then there’s the single parent, burning with the desire to participate but tethered to home by the practical demands of childcare. Their absence from the assembly isn’t a choice but a reflection of societal structures that often overlook the needs of caregivers.
These aren’t just isolated examples but windows into the complex web of systemic biases, societal prejudices, and physical limitations that create invisible barriers to participation. Each person’s unique combination of identities – their race, gender, class, ability, and more – shapes their experience of this fundamental right.
The tapestry of FoPA, when viewed through these intersectional lenses, reveals a more nuanced picture. It’s not just about the right to freedom of assembly, but about who can actually exercise that right without fear, without barriers, and with full participation. This realization challenges us to think more deeply about what true freedom of assembly looks like and how we can work towards making it a reality for all, not just in theory but in practice.
When people from different backgrounds come together to exercise their right to peaceful assembly, their collective voice becomes more powerful. Picture a scene in Beirut, where Lebanese activists stand side by side with migrant domestic workers from different migrant countries of origin, such as Ethiopia, Bangladesh, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, Kenya, etc. Their common aim? To advocate primarily for the abolition or reform of the Kafala (sponsorship) system i.e. improved working conditions and fundamental human rights. The combination and amplification of these voices in this gathering strengthens its impact, making it difficult for those in authority to ignore. However, realistically, in Lebanon’s case, the authorities seem unconcerned about this massive humanitarian breach. Envision a young Lebanese student holding a sign that says “Justice for Kenyan Mary” in memory of a domestic worker who passed away under suspicious circumstances. Beside her, a Filipina worker demands fair pay and the freedom to retain her passport. Their voices blend together, resonating through the streets – impossible to overlook, even as we still witness the government’s protestations throughout these efforts.
This amplification can lead to broader alliances and more comprehensive policy requests. What began as a demonstration of migrant workers’ rights now encompasses issues of gender equality, labor regulations, and systemic discrimination. A Lebanese labor rights advocate connects with a Sudanese domestic worker, both recognizing that their challenges are intertwined. This transforms the nature of peaceful assembly from a single-focused event into a multifaceted movement for structural transformation.
The crowd expands as local women’s rights organizations join in, acknowledging that the Kafala system not only exploits migrant workers but also perpetuates gender disparities, power dynamic issues, and different types of abuse-related matters. Environmental activists contribute their voices, emphasizing how climate change pushes more individuals into precarious work environments. As the sun sets over Beirut, the diverse group of protestors – Lebanese residents, migrant workers, supporters, and activists – stand in unity. Their strengthened voice conveys a compelling message: change and reform are not just achievable; they are imperative. It begins with acknowledging the dignity and rights of every person, irrespective of their nationality or occupation, in relation to FoPA.
While this unity is powerful, it also makes them vulnerable. Picture two police officers discussing the scene, one dismissing the protesters, stating the fact that they’re migrants and have no rights to demand anything, and the other labeling them as troublemakers. This reflects a harsh reality where those in power exploit the diversity of the protest to undermine it, questioning the legitimacy of voices that don’t fit their own narrative.
Imagine a Filipina worker in the crowd overhearing these comments and feeling a pang of doubt, wondering if she truly belongs there. But then something beautiful happens when a Lebanese woman notices the Filipina’s discomfort, she links arms with her and says, “We’re in this together. Your voice matters just as much as mine does.” This moment of solidarity is crucial. It reminds us that in these diverse movements, we must constantly check our own biases and support each other.
The landscape of peaceful protest is evolving as we gain a deeper understanding of the intersectionality of our identities and new ways for people to come together and express themselves, especially through the internet, which amplifies marginalized voices. However, this digital shift also presented challenges like accessibility and censorship. Recognizing direct actions’ unique and personal nature helps us see that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. By acknowledging these complexities, we can work towards ensuring that everyone has an equal opportunity to be heard when it matters most.
To go more in-depth into some of the areas we can explore and add more profundity to the topic, the historical context is an important aspect of the FoPA and Intersectionality relationship, we cannot deny how the relationship between FoPA (Freedom of Peaceful Assembly) and Intersectionality is deeply rooted in history. Picture a story spanning centuries where the struggle for peaceful gathering and expression has faced many challenges. It began with workers uniting for better conditions, especially among marginalized groups. The Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and 60s broadened this narrative to include economic inequalities. The women’s movement then highlighted the diverse experiences of women, particularly women of color. Following the Stonewall events in 1969, the LGBTQ+ community emphasized the intersections of love, race, gender, and class. Today, movements like Black Lives Matter connect these issues, showcasing how individual identities contribute to a collective fight against injustice. Ultimately, it’s about recognizing and addressing various forms of inequality to create a more equitable world for everyone.
-
Case Studies and Legal Framework
To make the picture clearer, highlighting some of the key moments where intersectional issues significantly impacted peaceful assemblies over the years, for instance, during Lebanon’s 2019 October Revolution: In October 2019, what started as a response to proposed taxes transformed into a widespread movement against corruption and economic mismanagement. A well-known activist and domestic worker, she got up on stage, and her story of abuse and unpaid wages which stroke a chord with everyone, as it highlighted the connection between their struggles under the kafala system and broader labor rights issues and corruption.
In the United States, the Black Lives Matter movement has increasingly intersected with climate justice activism, highlighting how environmental issues disproportionately affect communities of color. You could hear activists during protests chanting “Black Lives Matter! Climate Matters!” to showcase this intersection.
The COVID-19 pandemic further exposed inequalities faced by migrant workers in Lebanon, many of whom were stranded and without pay. Their sit-ins outside embassies illustrated the stark disparities in how health crises impact different communities.
While intersectionality can amplify voices and foster inclusive movements, it also presents challenges, such as backlash and the need for solidarity. Migrant workers in Lebanon often face harsh conditions in general already, which limits their ability to mobilize, so publicly participating in protests could lead to arbitrary arrests and/or deportations, detentions, etc. Despite these obstacles, recent collaborations between migrant workers and Lebanese activists have united their fight for rights and dignity.
Lastly, public support for migrant protests in countries that view migrants as integral to society and its economy is very influential, unlike in Lebanon, where workers are often seen as replaceable commodities. This further pushes migrant workers to seek support mainly from their communities or local/international NGOs.
-
Technology and Social Media
The online world is transforming how we gather and express ourselves; the impact of the online world on assembly and free speech is making it easier to unite and voice opinions without physical boundaries. No space? No problem, no more boundaries, a single hashtag can now spark global movements almost instantly, empowering those who might fear attending in-person protests. Voices from the shadows finding online platforms that provide a safer space to speak out, those who might have feared attending a physical protest, which empowers many who otherwise would have remained silent. However, this rapid organization can lead to chaos, and anonymity can pose risks, allowing for harassment without accountability. While digital platforms offer learning opportunities and amplify voices, they also create new inequalities due to varying access to technology and skills. Online harassment and privacy concerns are significant issues, especially for intersectional groups.
Online and offline protests are merging. A hashtag can lead to a street march, which in turn could turn to trends. This fusion is creating a new form of assembly. Overall, digital platforms enhance our ability to connect and advocate for change, but they also present challenges that need to be addressed. The aim is to create inclusive digital spaces that reflect the diverse needs of all groups, reimagining how we gather and engage in the digital age.
-
Counterarguments and Challenges
Applying intersectionality to the Freedom of Peaceful Assembly (FoPA) has gained both support and critique. Some worry it might overcomplicate things and the understanding of rights and responsibilities and split groups within assemblies, potentially leading to fragmentations. They argue that focusing on multiple identities could dilute the main collective message and objectives of a movement, making it harder to achieve consensus and mobilize effectively.
Moreover, some believe that intersectionality might accidentally create hierarchies of oppression, where certain identities are prioritized over others, leading to tensions within assemblies that could result in feelings of exclusion among individuals who may feel their specific experiences or needs are overlooked in favor of broader narratives.
In terms of potential conflicts, different groups within protests might clash over priorities. Imagine racial justice activists and LGBTQ+ rights supporters disagreeing on what to focus on first. Different intersectional groups within assemblies may have varying priorities and perspectives based on their unique experiences. To navigate such complexities, it is essential for assemblies to create spaces where open dialogue is encouraged and creates an inclusive spaces where all voices are heard. Finding common ground while respecting differences can help avoid conflicts and make movements stronger. Ultimately, embracing and practicing intersectionality thoughtfully, can enrich the discourse and lead to more comprehensive and fairer outcomes for everyone, provided that it is approached with sensitivity, teamwork and a commitment to collaboration.
-
Accessibility and Inclusion
Choosing venues, when planning an event, that are easily accessible via public transport and have good wheelchair access is definitely crucial and should be a mandatory everywhere, however whist talking about accessibility and inclusion there’s many more things to take into consideration.
When planning an event, it’s essential to choose venues that are accessible by public transport and have good wheelchair access. However, accessibility and inclusion involve more than just location. Timing is important; varying event times can accommodate different work schedules and family commitments. Including sign language interpreters and creating quiet zones can help engage participants with disabilities. Offering remote participation options and ensuring a diverse speaker lineup is also key. Providing multilingual materials and childcare support enhances accessibility further. Clear communication about accessibility features, such as bathrooms and seating, and training volunteers to assist respectfully, etc.
Universal design in peaceful assemblies is about creating inclusive experiences that benefit everyone rather than just specific groups from the get-go, not about special treatment. This approach includes choosing accessible locations, using clear language, and setting up spaces thoughtfully. The beauty of universal design lies in its broad benefits. Ultimately, embracing universal design helps create gatherings, events, and assemblies where everyone feels they belong, promoting unity in peaceful assemblies.
-
Intersectionality and State Response
Lebanon’s handling of intersectional protests has been pretty messy, to say the least. Thinking back to the October Revolution in 2019-2020 – there were all sorts of groups coming together, from LGBTQ+ activists to regular citizens pushing for economic reforms. The government’s response? Often heavy-handed, equipped with weapons, and missing the point. The big issue is that the authorities tend to see these diverse protests as more of a threat rather than just more inclusive. It’s like they’re stuck in an old-school mindset and are obligated by their superiors to stand against the people.
The Lebanese police could greatly benefit from training focused on cultural understanding and identity awareness. Learning to de-escalate situations without using force is essential, and having officers dedicated to community relations would help foster connections rather than create divisions.
On a policy level, a significant revamp is needed, particularly in how protests are managed. This will ensure that the diverse needs of different groups are respected and safeguarded. Accountability is crucial, with real consequences for any misconduct.
The challenge lies in implementing these changes since making all this happen won’t be a walk in the park, especially with Lebanon’s political maze and economic struggles. However, it would be a game-changer if successful and they manage to pull off these reforms. It could significantly enhance the protection of everyone’s right to peaceful assembly, regardless of who they are or where they come from. After all, isn’t that what democracy is all about?
-
Education and Awareness
To raise awareness and educate people about intersectionality and its significance for Freedom of Peaceful Assembly (FoPA), several key initiatives can be taken into account, firstly being launching public awareness campaigns using social media, public service announcements, and community events. This will explain how intersectionality, where different identities intersect, influences individuals’ rights to assemble peacefully. Moreover, workshops and forums in community space should be organized to facilitate open discussions on intersectionality. Diverse speakers can share their experiences, highlighting how intersectionality affects their ability to exercise FoPA. Last but not least, creating accessible online courses and webinars covering intersectionality’s basics, historical context, and relevance to civil rights.
As for the role of schools and universities, they play a crucial role in promoting an understanding of intersectionality and its implications for social justice. Integrating intersectionality into school curricula across subjects like social studies and literature. This approach would help students grasp the complexities of identity and its impact on issues like FoPA. Encourage student-led social justice clubs and organizations. These groups can host events and campaigns that promote awareness of intersectionality among their peers. Providing training for teachers to incorporate intersectionality into their teaching. This could prepare them to create inclusive classroom environments that respect diverse perspectives.
-
Migrant Domestic Workers (MDW) in Lebanon
The situation of migrant domestic workers in Lebanon, particularly regarding their rights to freedom of assembly and unionization, is complex and challenging, often fraught with challenges. Legally, Lebanon’s labor law excludes domestic workers from basic protections, and the Kafala system ties their legal status to their employers, creating a power imbalance that often leads to exploitation. In 2015, a group of MDWs attempted to form the first domestic workers’ union, which the Ministry of Labor initially approved. However, the government later declared the union illegal, claiming that as “foreigners,” these workers had no right to unionize under Lebanese law. MDWs have organized peaceful protests and demonstrations in Beirut and other cities, often focusing on issues like abuse, unpaid wages, and the kafala system. These assemblies are sometimes tolerated but can face opposition from authorities or employers.
Various local and international NGOs are dedicated to supporting the rights of migrant domestic workers, including their right to assemble. These organizations provide safe spaces for workers to gather and organize in privacy, addressing the challenges they face related to gender rights, racial discrimination, and economic inequality. The ongoing economic crisis and the aftermath of the 2020 Beirut explosion have heightened the vulnerability of these workers, leading to increased activism.
-
Conclusion
In conclusion, the interplay between Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and intersectionality reveals a complex tapestry of human rights, social justice, and collective action, underscoring the importance of recognizing the diverse experiences and identities that shape our collective actions.
From historical movements to contemporary digital activism, we’ve seen how intersectionality enriches and complicates the exercise of FoPA; technology and social media have expanded the reach and impact of collective action; however, as we have discussed above, the journey toward a more inclusive and equitable exercise of this fundamental right requires ongoing commitment and vigilance. Nevertheless, although we have witnessed some improvements, these changes also introduced new challenges and inequalities. The digital realm offers unprecedented opportunities for marginalized voices to unite, but it also presents risks of exclusion, harassment, and privacy concerns.
As we move forward, it’s crucial to embrace the complexity that intersectionality brings to FoPA; by fostering accessible spaces for assembly and prioritizing the voices of marginalized communities, we can address the systemic barriers that hinder participation. The evolution of social movements, both in physical and digital realms, calls for a deeper understanding of intersectionality and its implications for social justice. The story of FoPA and intersectionality is far from simple or over. As we navigate the complexities of our society, we must strive to ensure that the freedom of peaceful assembly is not merely a theoretical concept but a lived reality for all individuals. Only through this commitment can we truly honor the essence of democracy and uphold the rights of every person to assemble peacefully and express their collective will.
